Supported by Istanbul Growth Company and The Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (The “Istanbul Vulnerability Map in the Scope of Combating COVID-19” challenge carried out by BİMTAŞ, one of the subsidiaries of İBB, has been concluded.
DATA FROM 961 NEIGHBORHOODS COLLECTED
Inside the scope of the challenge, IMM Istanbul Statistics Workplace compiled the knowledge collected from 961 neighborhoods and examined the socio-economic standing of the neighborhoods, their transportation connections, city density and demographic construction.
RISKY, VULNERABLE AND REQUIRED EMERGENCY RESPONSE AREAS
Maps have been created in 4 major headings and twenty-two subheadings. The subtitles used for the creation of the maps have been calculated with the equally weighted index mannequin and contributed to the formation of the major titles. As well as, the sub-headings have been mapped by calculating index scores amongst themselves.
With these maps, it was aimed to determine dangerous, fragile areas and areas requiring pressing intervention, to make use of sources in a rational and optimum method in the struggle in opposition to the epidemic, to prioritize decision-making metropolis stakeholders on emergency response areas, and to contribute to response insurance policies.
SPATIAL EXPANDATION RISK
The outcomes of the vulnerability map on account of spatial unfold risk, socio-economic vulnerability map, vulnerability map associated to transportation and vulnerability map associated to city density, created inside the scope of the challenge, are as follows:
In the Zeytinburnu Beştelsiz District, the risk ranges of the inhabitants of the “Life Matches Dwelling” software have been decided in response to the legend ranges on the map, with the index associated to the spatial unfold risk. The index based mostly on the spatial unfold risk was created by calculating the excessive or low ranges of the unfold of the epidemic in numerous areas by predicting that the density of the inhabitants dwelling in dangerous areas could be excessive.
15 sub-indicators have been used in the creation of the index based mostly on the risk of spatial unfold. These indicators are the risk density of the “Hayat Eve Sığar” software, the quantity of household well being facilities, the quantity of purchasing malls, the quantity of pharmacies, the quantity of locations of worship, the quantity of public establishments, the quantity of service areas equivalent to cafes, the quantity of markets, the quantity of libraries, the quantity of parks and inexperienced areas, the quantity of well being establishments. the quantity of touristic areas, the quantity of kindergartens and first faculties, the quantity of public transport stops, and the quantity of industrial areas. It was noticed that the fragility of neighborhoods with excessive inhabitants mobility and density was excessive.
It was decided that the neighborhoods on the European Facet have been extra dangerous than the Anatolian Facet, and the presence of well being establishments and organizations on the European Facet had an impact on this case. The neighborhoods with the highest vulnerability on account of spatial unfold risk are respectively; Bestelsiz (Zeytinburnu), Kemalpasa (Fatih), Kalenderhane (Fatih), Gokalp (Zeytinburnu), Iskenderpasa (Fatih), Ismetpasa (Sultangazi), Messiahpasa (Fatih), Barbaros Hayrettin Pasa (Gaziosmanpasa), Hürriyet (Bahcelievler), Fevzi Cakmak ( Bahçelievler)
SOCIO-ECONOMIC VULNERABILITY
In the creation of the socio-economic fragility index, the dimension of the family, which impacts the epidemic risk and vulnerability throughout the Covid-19 epidemic, the quantity of households making use of for social help from IMM, the quantity of financial institution branches, rental housing worth stage, earnings stage, college graduate charge indicators have been used.
the outcomes of the socio-economic fragility index, it was seen that the areas outlined as rural neighborhoods have the next risk in comparison with the neighborhoods in the metropolis middle.
Çatalca, Silivri, Arnavutköy on the European Facet; It has been decided that the socio-economic risk is excessive in the districts of Beykoz, Pendik and Şile on the Anatolian Facet. In the districts of Kadıköy, Ataşehir, Beşiktaş, Bakırköy and Şişli, the socio-economic fragility values have been low. Fatih (Arnavutköy), Yunus Emre (Arnavutköy), Atatürk (Arnavutköy), rice (Eyüpsultan), Şahintepe (Başakşehir), Oklalı (Çatalca), Yavuz Selim (Arnavutköy), Göçbeyli (Pendik), Yayla (Sultangazi), Hicret (Arnavutköy) ) have been decided as the neighborhoods with the highest socio-economic risk.
VULNERABILITY DUE TO TRANSPORTATION
The indications of the quantity of journeys that have an effect on vulnerability and the risk of epidemics, the share of public transportation journeys in automobile journeys, the density of bus stops, the quantity of disabled passengers, and the quantity of passengers over 65 have been used to create the transportation-related vulnerability index. In keeping with the outcomes of the vulnerability index associated to transportation, it was seen that the risk of neighborhoods situated on the major transportation axes of Istanbul is excessive.
Particularly in the neighborhoods the place the European Freeway (E-5), Trans-European North South Freeway (E-80) and metro strains cross, the vulnerability values have been discovered to be excessive. Whereas the neighborhoods on the European Facet have been extra dangerous than these on the Anatolian Facet, the index values have been larger in the neighborhoods situated in Bakırköy, Bahçelievler, Zeytinburnu, Bayrampaşa and Şişli districts.
The neighborhoods with the highest vulnerability associated to transportation are respectively; Mimar Sinan (Üsküdar), Aksaray (Fatih), Esentepe (Şişli), Heart (Şişli), Caferağa (Kadıköy), Osmaniye (Bakırköy), Acıbadem (Kadıköy), İçerenköy (Ataşehir), Ünalan (Üsküdar), Topçular (Eyüpsultan) it occurred.
VULNERABILITY DUE TO URBAN DENSITY
City inhabitants density, quantity of purchasing malls, quantity of touristic areas, quantity of public branches, quantity of college students per classroom, quantity of days in which markets are established, and industrial space indicators have been used to create the vulnerability index on account of city density. In keeping with the outcomes of the vulnerability index associated to city density, the risk ratios of the neighborhoods situated in the metropolis middle and sub-centers of Istanbul have been decided as excessive.
It was famous that the fragility of the neighborhoods situated in Bahçelievler, Bağcılar, Esenler, Güngören, Başakşehir, Zeytinburnu, Gaziosmanpaşa and Sultangazi districts the place the inhabitants is concentrated, city mobility is excessive or commerce circulation is excessive. On the European Facet, the place the service sector and enterprise areas are concentrated in Istanbul, the risk on account of city density was a lot larger than on the Anatolian Facet. This end result was additionally affected by the inadequate quantity of open and inexperienced areas in some districts on the European Facet in comparison with the inhabitants of the district and the dimension of the district, and the intense housing and industrial areas. The neighborhoods with the highest vulnerability on account of city density are respectively; Ziya Gokalp (Basaksehir), Black Sea (Gaziosmanpasa), Icerenkoy (Atasehir), Şenlikkoy (Bakirkoy), Hurriyet (Bahcelievler), Sirinevler (Bahceliever), Soganli (Bahcelievler), Ismetpasa (Sultangazi), Ahmet Yesevi (Pendik), Cevizli (Maltepe) ) was decided.
#neighborhoods #highest #risk #coronavirus #Istanbul
