6 EU countries want to send back Afghans whose asylum applications were rejected

6 European Union (EU) member countries, in a joint letter they despatched to the European Fee, demanded the return of Afghan residents whose asylum applications were rejected.

The governments of the Netherlands, Austria, Germany, Belgium, Denmark and Greece demand the extradition of Afghan residents whose asylum applications have been rejected and who’ve exhausted all authorized treatments.

“WE ARE CONCERNED BY AFGAN MIGRANT” STATEMENT

Within the letter signed by the inside or immigration ministers of 6 EU member countries, it was said that Afghanistan was the second nation with the best variety of asylum applications to the EU in 2020, and it was famous that there was concern that this pattern would proceed.

“THEY WILL CAUSE MORE ASYLUM APPLICATIONS”

The letter states that not sending back Afghans whose asylum applications have been rejected, (*6*)”it should give the improper message and trigger extra asylum applications” highlighted.

CALL FOR COOPERATION

Within the letter, during which it’s said that roughly 4.6 million Afghans were displaced, the EU Fee Afghanistan It was known as upon to cooperate with the countries in and across the nation on asylum.

with the EU Afghanistan Within the letter, which referred to the declaration of 28 April 2021 signed between the federal government of the Republic of Turkey on refoulement, it was famous that the return course of wouldn’t be stopped unilaterally and that such choices needs to be taken collectively.

REACTION TO THE LETTER FROM REFUGEES

Vluchtelingenwerk Nederland affiliation, which helps refugees within the Netherlands, made a press release on Twitter concerning the letter of 6 EU countries, that their asylum utility was rejected. Afghanistan He criticized the Netherlands’ request on this route, stating that sending its residents back to their countries was “a really harmful gamble”.

Gerald Knaus, the founding father of the European Stability Initiative, which works on migration insurance policies in Europe, mentioned in his Twitter message concerning the letter. (*6*)”Essentially the most embarrassing international coverage doc ever to seem within the historical past books” used the phrase.

“LETTER, SHAME”

Hannah Neumann, a member of the Inexperienced Occasion of the EU Parliament, reacting to the letter, on Twitter. (*6*)”Why did Germany signal this shameful letter” Along with his assertion, he confirmed his response to the initiative of 6 countries.

Afghanistan Ministry of Migration, in its letter dated 8 July 2021 to the EU Fee, introduced that it had stopped the take-back of Afghan residents whose asylum applications were rejected and can be despatched back because of this, for a interval of three months.

“NOT EU, MEMBER COUNTRIES WILL DECIDE”

Within the meantime, in a press release from Brussels, it was famous that the return of Afghans whose asylum applications were rejected can be determined by the member states, not the EU.

Adelbert Jahnz, one of many spokespersons of the EU Fee, said that the return of Afghans whose asylum applications were rejected is just not on the disposal of the Union and depends upon the selections to be taken by the member states.

THE QUESTION IS AFGHANISTAN SAFE FOR RETURNS

Talking in regards to the joint letter of 6 member states stating that they want to proceed to send back the Afghan residents whose asylum applications were rejected, Jahnz mentioned; He confirmed that the letter signed by the Ministers of the Inside of the Netherlands, Austria, Germany, Belgium, Denmark and Greece had reached the Fee.

When requested by a journalist about whether or not Afghanistan is secure for returns, Jahnz emphasised that the EU has no discretion on the choice to return, and that it’s a choice on the nationwide degree that every member nation will take because of particular person evaluations.

“PRIORITY SUSTAINABLE PEACE”

Jahnz said that they’re involved with the member states and that completely different reactions have been obtained from completely different countries, and that the brand new asylum and migration bundle proposal ready by the Fee goals to get rid of the variations between the member states and to undertake a extra constant frequent strategy.

One of many spokespersons, Nabila Massrali, mentioned that the precedence in Afghanistan is to guarantee sustainable peace and so they assist the continuation of the Afghan talks in Doha. The spokesperson famous {that a} technical briefing assembly will likely be held on the scenario in Afghanistan through the day.